Comparison
Embedding Models Comparison 2026
Complete comparison of embedding models available in 2026 — pricing, dimensions, quality benchmarks, and migration paths.
All Embedding Models at a Glance
| Model | Provider | Dims | Max Tokens | Price/1M tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
text-embedding-3-large | OpenAI | 3072 | 8191 | $0.13 |
text-embedding-3-small | OpenAI | 1536 | 8191 | $0.02 |
text-embedding-ada-002 | OpenAI | 1536 | 8191 | $0.10 |
gemini-embedding-2 | 768 | 2048 | Free* | |
gemini-embedding-001 | 768 | 2048 | Free* |
*Google Gemini embeddings are free under API rate limits. Paid plans available for higher throughput.
Cost Analysis: Monthly Spend by Volume
| Volume | ada-002 | 3-small | 3-large | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.02 | $0.13 | $0.00 |
| 10M tokens | $1.00 | $0.20 | $1.30 | $0.00 |
| 100M tokens | $10.00 | $2.00 | $13.00 | $0.00 |
| 1B tokens | $100.00 | $20.00 | $130.00 | $0.00 |
The Catch: Vectors Are Not Compatible
You can't just swap text-embedding-3-small for gemini-embedding-2
and query your existing database. Even models with the same dimensions produce vectors
in completely different mathematical spaces.
Cross-querying incompatible vectors returns garbage results:
| Query Model | Index Model | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|
| 3-small | ada-002 | 0.0% (same vendor, same dims!) |
| 3-large | gemini-2 | 0.0% |
| 3-small | 3-small | 100% (same model) |
How to Switch Models Without Re-embedding
Schift uses projection matrices to map vectors between model spaces, achieving 92-104% retrieval recovery (yes, sometimes projections improve results):
| Migration Path | Recall@10 Recovery | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| ada-002 → 3-small | 99.2% | SAFE |
| ada-002 → gemini-2 | 97.8% | SAFE |
| 3-small → gemini-2 | 99.7% | SAFE |
| 3-large → gemini-2 | 98.1% | SAFE |
| 3-small → 3-large | 104.2% | SAFE |
Decision Matrix: Which Model Should You Use?
Choose Gemini if:
- Cost matters — free under rate limits
- 768 dimensions are sufficient (most RAG use cases)
- You want multi-provider redundancy
- You're starting a new project
Choose OpenAI 3-small if:
- You need 1536 dimensions for precision
- You're already on OpenAI and cost is acceptable ($0.02/1M tokens is cheap)
- Longer context windows matter (8191 tokens vs 2048)
Choose OpenAI 3-large if:
- Maximum retrieval precision is critical
- Your domain is highly specialized (legal, medical, scientific)
- Budget is not a constraint
Avoid ada-002:
- Legacy model — 5x more expensive than 3-small with no quality advantage
- If you're still on ada-002, migrating to 3-small or Gemini saves money immediately
Migrate Between Any Models
pip install schift
from schift import Schift
s = Schift(api_key="sk-...")
# Test any migration path
report = s.bench.run(
source="openai/text-embedding-ada-002",
target="google/gemini-embedding-2"
)
print(f"Recovery: {report.recall_at_10}")
# If satisfied, migrate
s.upgrade(db="my_db", to="google/gemini-embedding-2") Compare models with your own data
Run benchmarks on your actual queries. See real recovery numbers before you migrate.
Start benchmarking free