Comparison

Embedding Models Comparison 2026

Complete comparison of embedding models available in 2026 — pricing, dimensions, quality benchmarks, and migration paths.

Updated March 2026

All Embedding Models at a Glance

Model Provider Dims Max Tokens Price/1M tokens
text-embedding-3-large OpenAI 3072 8191 $0.13
text-embedding-3-small OpenAI 1536 8191 $0.02
text-embedding-ada-002 OpenAI 1536 8191 $0.10
gemini-embedding-2 Google 768 2048 Free*
gemini-embedding-001 Google 768 2048 Free*

*Google Gemini embeddings are free under API rate limits. Paid plans available for higher throughput.

Cost Analysis: Monthly Spend by Volume

Volume ada-002 3-small 3-large Gemini
1M tokens $0.10 $0.02 $0.13 $0.00
10M tokens $1.00 $0.20 $1.30 $0.00
100M tokens $10.00 $2.00 $13.00 $0.00
1B tokens $100.00 $20.00 $130.00 $0.00

The Catch: Vectors Are Not Compatible

You can't just swap text-embedding-3-small for gemini-embedding-2 and query your existing database. Even models with the same dimensions produce vectors in completely different mathematical spaces.

Cross-querying incompatible vectors returns garbage results:

Query Model Index Model Recall@10
3-small ada-002 0.0% (same vendor, same dims!)
3-large gemini-2 0.0%
3-small 3-small 100% (same model)

How to Switch Models Without Re-embedding

Schift uses projection matrices to map vectors between model spaces, achieving 92-104% retrieval recovery (yes, sometimes projections improve results):

Migration Path Recall@10 Recovery Verdict
ada-002 → 3-small 99.2% SAFE
ada-002 → gemini-2 97.8% SAFE
3-small → gemini-2 99.7% SAFE
3-large → gemini-2 98.1% SAFE
3-small → 3-large 104.2% SAFE

Decision Matrix: Which Model Should You Use?

Choose Gemini if:

  • Cost matters — free under rate limits
  • 768 dimensions are sufficient (most RAG use cases)
  • You want multi-provider redundancy
  • You're starting a new project

Choose OpenAI 3-small if:

  • You need 1536 dimensions for precision
  • You're already on OpenAI and cost is acceptable ($0.02/1M tokens is cheap)
  • Longer context windows matter (8191 tokens vs 2048)

Choose OpenAI 3-large if:

  • Maximum retrieval precision is critical
  • Your domain is highly specialized (legal, medical, scientific)
  • Budget is not a constraint

Avoid ada-002:

  • Legacy model — 5x more expensive than 3-small with no quality advantage
  • If you're still on ada-002, migrating to 3-small or Gemini saves money immediately

Migrate Between Any Models

pip install schift

from schift import Schift
s = Schift(api_key="sk-...")

# Test any migration path
report = s.bench.run(
    source="openai/text-embedding-ada-002",
    target="google/gemini-embedding-2"
)
print(f"Recovery: {report.recall_at_10}")

# If satisfied, migrate
s.upgrade(db="my_db", to="google/gemini-embedding-2")

Compare models with your own data

Run benchmarks on your actual queries. See real recovery numbers before you migrate.

Start benchmarking free